TEMPLEBOROUGH_BIOMASS_POW - Accounts
TEMPLEBOROUGH_BIOMASS_POW - Accounts
The Directors present the Strategic Report of Templeborough Biomass Power Plant Limited (the “Company”) for the period ended 31 December 2022. Details of the Directors who held office during the period and as at the date of this report are given on page 4.
The Company is a private company, limited by shares, and was incorporated under the laws of England and Wales on 29 April 2010.
The principal activity of the company is the generation of electricity from renewable biomass fuels, primarily waste wood, at Templeborough Biomass Power Plant, in Rotherham, South Yorkshire
The principal risks and uncertainties facing the Company, and an explanation of how they are managed, are set out below.
Competitive Risk
The company is reliant on certain key suppliers for contracts which are subject to periodic competitive tender. Renewal of these contracts is uncertain and based on financial and performance criteria. The board continually monitors these arrangements as part of the routine operation of the business.
Legislative risk
The company operates under two primary legislative frameworks. The electricity generation asset operates under a Licence granted from the Environment Agency [Permit number EPR/ GP3433WS] and UK Health and Safety Legislation and Guidance. These frameworks are subject to continuous revision and any new directive may have a material impact on the ability of the company to operate successfully.
A breach of these regulations or an accident could lead to damages or compensation to the extent such loss is not covered by insurance policies, adverse publicity or reputational damage.
The Company engages an independent health and safety consultant to ensure the ongoing appropriateness of its health and safety policies and procedures.
Regulatory risk
Regulatory risk may arise from a change in regulations and law that might affect industry or business. Renewable energy projects are dependent for their commercial viability on a suitable regulatory regime. There is a risk that the government may introduce retrospective changes to the regime that was agreed at the time the project commenced. This is unusual in the market and changes to the regulatory regime are more typically for future projects.
Both legislative and regulatory risk are managed by awareness of industry news and publications.
Fuel Availability and Prices
100 % of the fuel required for the plant is secured under a long-term contract with Esken Renewables, the leading waste wood biomass supplier in the UK, with a fixed price escalated in accordance with published inflation indices. This contract is underwritten by suitable guarantees and securities from Esken Renewables' parent company. A fall in the creditworthiness of Esken Renewables or its parent could have a negative impact on the Company.
Availability and Operating Performance
The availability and operating performance of the equipment used on biomass power plants may be impacted by accidents, mechanical failure, grid availability or damage which will directly impact on the revenues and profitability of that plant. Failures may be the result of a short-term issue or a long-term fundamental failure of one piece of equipment, for example, which could impact returns, if there is exposure to one manufacturer.
Operating and maintenance agreements and asset management agreements are put in place to monitor the investment on a daily basis. Insurance coverage is put in place for material damage and business interruption.
Asset Life
In the event that the asset does not operate for the period of time assumed or requires higher than expected maintenance expenditure to do so, it could have a material adverse effect on the financial performance and position of the Company.
The Board performs regular reviews and ensures that appropriate maintenance is performed. Regular maintenance ensures that equipment is in good working order to meet its expected life span.
Electricity Prices
The wholesale power price received for electricity generated is an important revenue stream. Future cashflows have been modelled using a forecast of power prices published by independent market experts. A fall in the achieved price below these forecasts would have a negative impact on the Company.
Financing Risk
The Company is financed by a loan provided by the parent company. The Company has received confirmation from Greencoat Mermaid Ltd that it will not demand repayment of this loan for at least 12 months from the date of approval of these financial statements unless the Company has sufficient cash to finance its ongoing obligations. Further details of the basis on which the financial statements are prepared on the going concern basis are set out in note 1.2.
The key financial and other performance indicators during the year were as follows:
| 2022 | 2021 |
| £ | £ |
Turnover | 67,597,952 | 52,465,085 |
Operating profit | 38,712,502 | 23,993,286 |
Profit/(Loss) after tax | 14,418,003 | (2,454,057) |
Equity shareholders’ funds | (23,775,958) | (38,193,961) |
Energy produced | 260,273MWh | 292,491MWh |
Turnover has increased in the year by 15,132,867 (28.84%) from 2021. This increase has been primarily due to high brown power prices across the market following the rise in global gas prices.
Outlook
Waste wood arisings have continued at pre-pandemic levels throughout 2022. Arisings tend to follow GDP, so a recession in 2023 might impact waste wood availability, albeit that the supplier maintains strategic stocks across the country.
Power prices during the year were well above budget, primarily reflecting high gas prices. The average N2EX Day Ahead auction price was £203.79/MWh (2021: £117.43/MWh). Forward power prices over the period 2023-2026 remain high. High power prices again drove strong cash generation in 2022 and the Company should continue to benefit from strong cash generation over the next few years through its balanced exposure to power prices.
High power prices have inevitably been considered by the Government in the context of balancing the country’s fiscal position. The Manager has clarity in relation to the Electricity Generator Levy at a rate of 45 per cent of annual average power revenue above an index linked £75/MWh. FITs are excluded from the levy and the Company also benefits from a £10 million annual allowance. The levy applies from 1 January 2023 until 31 March 2028.
The Government’s Review of Electricity Market Arrangements (“REMA”) continues, with a second round of consultation expected shortly. The aim of REMA is to accommodate a higher proportion of renewable generation and storage on the electricity network in line with the UK’s target to decarbonise the electricity sector by 2035.
In general, the outlook for the Company is very encouraging, with proven operational and financial performance.
On behalf of the board
The directors present their annual report and financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2022.
The results for the year are set out on page 15.
No ordinary dividends were paid. The directors do not recommend payment of a final dividend.
The directors who held office during the year and up to the date of signature of the financial statements were as follows:
The auditor, Azets Audit Services, is deemed to be reappointed under section 487(2) of the Companies Act 2006.
Corporate and Social Responsibility
Environmental, Social and Governance Matters
The directors and Manager strive to maintain the highest standards of corporate governance and effective risk identification and management. The directors and Manager support the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (‘TCFD’) and refer to them for guidance on addressing climate related risks and opportunities in order to enhance disclosures. These disclosures are categorised between the four thematic areas, as recommended by the TCFD.
In addition, the Manager's dedicated ESG committee meets regularly to discuss ESG and climate related risks relating to the Company and other entities it manages. This committee has implemented an ESG Policy that looks to establish best practice in climate related risk management, reporting and transparency.
The directors and Manager monitor climate related risks and appreciate their impact on the Company. More extreme weather patterns arising from global warming have the capacity to damage infrastructure in general, including above ground grid infrastructure. However, it is considered unlikely that damage will be caused to the type of generating equipment owned by the Company. Appropriate insurance against property damage and business interruption is held for any such eventuality, nonetheless. It is possible that the deployment of new renewable generating capacity, required to meet future targets, could reduce the power price achieved by the Company's investment.
Climate risk can be classified into two broad categories: (i) the risks associated with the physical impacts of climate change and, (ii) the risks associated with the transition to a decarbonised economy.
Physical risks may consist of acute physical risk, which can refer to event driven perils, including increased severity of extreme weather events (e.g.: floods/storms) and chronic physical risk, which can refer to longer-term shifts in climate patterns (e.g.: sustained higher temperatures) that cause sea level rise, heat waves, droughts, and desertification. Renewable energy assets need to be resilient to the foreseen extreme weather events and temperatures.
Transition risks refer to policy, legal, reputational, technology and market risks of moving to a decarbonised economy. These can refer to a redistribution of incentives from high to low carbon technologies and markets. Liability may arise with respect to operational greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions (direct and indirect), and there may also be increased stakeholder and regulatory attention on climate risk disclosures and reporting of GHG emissions facilitated through financial services and other enabling professional services. Not taking adequate steps to address climate change may lead to a higher exposure to transition risk, including reputational damage.
Climate risk assessment requires forward-looking scenario analysis. This can affect the short, medium, and long-term outlook of business value, operations and assumptions. Climate-related risks can be region, location, sector, company and asset specific. Climate risk can be non-linear, systemic, not stationary, (it can lead to the breakdown of an entire system e.g.: food, health, economy) and regressive (disproportionally affecting the poor and vulnerable), which can result in high socioeconomic impacts and shocks. Therefore, climate-related risks may affect most, if not all, of the material sustainability factors in any given sub-sector.
Sudden changes in climate policies, technology or market sentiment could lead to economic dislocation and a reassessment of the value of a variety of assets. A late and abrupt transition to a decarbonised economy could lead to assets suddenly losing value and a rapid repricing of climate-related risks if they are not already sufficiently priced in by market participants. In turn, this could negatively affect the balance sheets of market participants, with potential consequences for financial stability. Changes beyond the levels anticipated by the Manager could have a material adverse effect on the operations and financial performance of the Company and its investments. Furthermore, should these climate risks fail to be identified and mitigated or materially changed, they could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
To ensure strong performance, the Company reinforces its specific oversight on environmental and social issues with a range of activities, including:
• appointing at least one director from the Manager to the boards of the investee companies, to ensure monitoring and influence of both financial and ESG performance;
• carrying out due diligence to ensure that any new outsourced service providers are reputable and responsible organisations;
• carrying out due diligence during the acquisition of new wind farms in accordance with the Manager's established procedures and ESG Framework Policy, and in compliance with the AIFMD Due Diligence Policy; and
• complying with all applicable anti-bribery and corruption, and anti-money laundering laws and regulations and implementing policies to ensure this performance is in line with the policies of the Manager.
The Manager's Investment Committee comprises experienced senior managers. Whilst making investment decisions, due consideration is given to climate related risks as well as to opportunities identified during due diligence.
During the procurement processes of investments, environmental risks are carried out, including flood risk assessments. For certain assets, we will also look at the plant to ensure the design complies with specifics of the geotechnical reports for a site i.e. depth of piles or if the site is in a higher risk flood area appropriate installation of drainage mitigation solutions such as swales and drainage channels, alongside ensuring appropriate coverage from insurance policies. Our risk registers consider climate risks, and we ensure to keep these updated to keep abreast of any climate-related development.
In 2022, the Greencoat Energy Transition team completed a portfolio wide climate scenario modelling assessment on all its bioenergy and heat assets, using an external scenario modelling tool. All the assets assessed were analysed under RCP 2.6 and 8.5 scenarios using the time horizons: 2030, 2050, and 2100. The assets were analysed against eight extreme weather and climate change hazards; Riverine Flooding, Surface Water Flooding, Coastal Inundation, Forest Fires, Extreme Wind, Soil Movement, Freeze-Thaw and Extreme Heat events.
The third party operations and maintenance (“O&M”) service providers report to the Managers asset managers on a monthly basis on a standard set of KPIs and qualitative factors, such as health and safety compliance of O&M providers, compliance with relevant laws and regulations, local community engagement and habitat management, where relevant. These KPIs are disclosed annually in the Managers ESG report. The Manager adopts a balanced and proportionate approach to the disclosure of ESG events to investors and, if appropriate, communicates significant incidents as they occur. Any material ESG incidents are communicated to the director's and Manager, where it is assessed and decided whether to communicate to investors.
KPI data is sourced directly from the Special Purpose Vehicles (“SPVs”) and supplemented by specialist external advisers such as environmental consultants, as required.
| Year ended | Year ended |
Scope 1 – Direct emissions (tonnes CO2) | 15,757 | 51 |
Scope 2 – Indirect emissions (tonnes CO2) | - | 177 |
Scope 3 – Indirect emissions (tonnes CO2) | 20,768 | Not available |
Total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions (tonnes CO2) | 36,525 | 288 |
Carbon footprint indicators are measured in line with the industry standard GHG Protocol based on an equity control approach, meaning emissions from the Company’s operations are weighted according to the SPVs’ ownership interest. Scope emissions calculations will be verified by third party consultants. The sustainability indicators are subject to an annual review to ensure that the Manager continues to improve transparency on ESG matters.
Scope 3 emissions are the result of activities from assets not owned or controlled by the Company, but that the Company indirectly impacts in its value chain. Scope 3 emissions include all sources not within the Company’s Scope 1 and 2 boundary and include, inter alia, emissions arising from the construction of assets acquired in the year, including those emissions associated with the manufacturing and transport of all equipment and material, before the asset was commissioned.
Targets
The Manager has set a commitment to cut scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity by 50% by 2030, using 2022 as a baseline. In 2022, the Manager standardised the carbon footprints of the funds it manages by following a consistent methodology across all our companies, to ensure that figures are consistent going forward in net zero trajectories.
Climate Related Risks
Transition risks
Short term (1-3 years)
Policy and legal - Increased carbon and climate-related regulations and associated compliance costs
Reputation - We only expect renewable energy to become more important along road to a net-zero economy. Thus, we do not believe there are reputational risks which would impact the Company through the investment strategy. Failing to disclose against regulatory ESG standards, such as the TCFD, could carry reputational risk. We mitigate this through ensuring our ESG Committee is monitoring compliance with Manager’s ESG policy and horizon scanning for ESG regulatory developments.
Policy and legal - Retrospective changes to the financial support of renewable energy. Change of UK Government, or change in UK Government direction regarding renewable energy, could lead to future unfavourable renewable energy policies. Unfavourable renewable energy policies if applied retrospectively to current operating projects, including those in the portfolio, could adversely impact the market price for renewable energy or the green benefits earned from generating renewable energy.
Specifically: - Renewable Obligation Certificates (ROCs) - Other: embedded benefits, carbon price floor.
Schroders Greencoat LLP ("IM") mitigates this risk through keeping itself abreast of developments in international support for renewable energy and will assess the impact of any changes and, where possible, respond to these changes when and if they happen. The UK has committed to the concept of grandfathering existing projects with subsidy support i.e., it cannot change support.
Market - Power prices could decline with increased renewable energy capacity. We mitigate this risk through monitoring current and forecasted electricity prices, the market experts in power pricing. The portfolios are full pay-out vehicles and operate a no leverage strategy which manages potential volatility.
Reputation -We only expect renewable energy to become more important along road to a net-zero economy. Thus, we do not believe there are reputational risks which would impact the Company through the investment strategy. Failing to disclose against regulatory ESG standards, such as the TCFD, could carry reputational risk. We mitigate this through ensuring our ESG Committee is monitoring compliance with Manager's ESG policy and horizon scanning for ESG regulatory developments.
Policy and legal - Retrospective changes to the financial support of renewable energy. Change of UK Government, or change in UK Government direction regarding renewable energy, could lead to future unfavourable renewable energy policies. Unfavourable renewable energy policies if applied retrospectively to current operating projects, including those in the portfolio, could adversely impact the market price for renewable energy or the green benefits earned from generating renewable energy. Specifically: - ROCs - Other: embedded benefits, carbon price floor
Schroders Greencoat LLP ("IM") mitigates this risk through keeping itself abreast of developments in international support for renewable energy and will assess the impact of any changes and, where possible, respond to these changes when and if they happen. The UK has committed to the concept of grandfathering existing projects with subsidy support i.e., it cannot change support.
Technology - The emergence of commercial scale carbon capture and storage (CCS) could lead to greater requirements to capture carbon at source from emitters. We are investing in a feasibility study at one of our biomass power plants to investigate a carbon capture project on the site. This work includes evaluating technical solutions, offtake opportunities – both for storage or utilisation of the CO2, engagement with policy makers, local stakeholders, including local authorities and local industries with aligned strategies.
Market - Power prices could decline with increased renewable energy capacity. We mitigate this risk through monitoring current and forecasted electricity prices via the engagement of market experts in power pricing. The portfolios are full pay-out vehicles and operate a no leverage strategy which manages potential volatility.
Reputation - We only expect renewable energy to become more important along road to a net-zero economy. Thus, we do not believe there are reputational risks facing us. Failing to disclose against regulatory ESG standards, such as the TCFD, could carry reputational risk. We mitigate this through ensuring our ESG Committee is Committee is monitoring compliance with Manager's ESG policy and horizon scanning for ESG regulatory developments.
Physical risks
Acute
Short term - Flood risk may disrupt supply chains. To mitigate this risk, flood and weather patterns are assessed on a site-specific basis through competent consultants and equipment providers at the development stage.
Medium term - Flood risk may disrupt supply chains. To mitigate this risk, flood and weather patterns are assessed on a site-specific basis through competent consultants and equipment providers at the development stage.
Long term - Extreme weather events such as storms, flooding, and heatwaves may disrupt supply chains and hinder maintenance or construction work on projects in the portfolio. Failure to carry out maintenance work can reduce or even stop electrical output, impacting company revenue. We mitigate this risk through keeping supply chains as short as possible and disruption risk managed through strategic spares to improve resilience.
Chronic
Sea level rise increases flood risk. We mitigate this through our investment processes. Prior to an investment, we will review environmental factors such as flood risk. These are long term obligations which not only have to be complied with in construction, but through the life of the asset. For certain assets, we will also look at the plant to ensure the design complies with specifics of the geotechnical reports for a site i.e., depth of piles or if the site is in a higher risk flood area appropriate installation of drainage mitigation solutions such as swales and drainage channels.
Risks linked to water scarcity (expected to increase in some areas as the biomass energy production process is water-intensive).
As at 31 December 2022, the Company had current assets of £23 million (2021: £24 million), net liabilities of £24 million (2021: net liabilities of £38 million) and had cash balances of £5.2 million (2021:£5.3 million). The Company continues to meet its day-to-day liquidity requirements though its cash resources. As at 31 December 2022, the Company owed parent company Greencoat Mermaid Ltd £169.2 million (2021: £198.2 million) as disclosed in note 16. The Company has received confirmation from Greencoat Mermaid Ltd that it will not demand repayment of the loan or seek repayment of interest on this loan for at least 12 months from the date of approval of this report unless the Company has sufficient cash to finance its ongoing obligations.
The Company will continue making repayments in the coming year.
The Manager has considered the impact of the Government’s windfall tax on UK electricity generators, including renewables. The tax applies to revenue earned on power prices in excess of £75 per MWh, which is higher than the prices that underlying investments require to generate cash surpluses. As a result of this, the Manager does not consider the windfall tax has created any material uncertainty over the assessment of the Company as a going concern.
The Directors and Manager have reviewed the Company’s forecasts and projections taking into account foreseeable changes in investment and trading performance, as well as consideration to worse case outcomes, which show that the Company has sufficient financial resources to meet its current obligations as they fall due for a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of this report.
On the basis of this review, and after making due enquiries, the directors and the Manager have a reasonable expectation that the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for at least 12 months from the date of approval of this report. Accordingly, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.
select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently; make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent; prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will continue in business.
give a true and fair view of the state of the company's affairs as at 31 December 2022 and of its profit for the year then ended; have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
Basis for opinion
Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
Other information
Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of our audit:
the information given in the strategic report and the directors' report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and
the strategic report and the directors' report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or certain disclosures of remuneration specified by law are not made; or we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
As explained more fully in the directors' responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at: https://www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor's report.
Extent to which the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above and on the Financial Reporting Council’s website, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud.
We obtain and update our understanding of the entity, its activities, its control environment, and likely future developments, including in relation to the legal and regulatory framework applicable and how the entity is complying with that framework. Based on this understanding, we identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. This includes consideration of the risk of acts by the entity that were contrary to applicable laws and regulations, including fraud.
In response to the risk of irregularities and non-compliance with laws and regulations, including fraud, we designed procedures which included:
Enquiry of management and those charged with governance around actual and potential litigation and claims as well as actual, suspected and alleged fraud;
Reviewing minutes of meetings of those charged with governance;
Assessing the extent of compliance with the laws and regulations considered to have a direct material effect on the financial statements or the operations of the company through enquiry and inspection;
Reviewing financial statement disclosures and testing to supporting documentation to assess compliance with applicable laws and regulations;
Performing audit work over the risk of management bias and override of controls, including testing of journal entries and other adjustments for appropriateness, evaluating the business rationale of significant transactions outside the normal course of business and reviewing accounting estimates for indicators of potential bias.
Because of the inherent limitations of an audit, there is a risk that we will not detect all irregularities, including those leading to a material misstatement in the financial statements or non-compliance with regulation. This risk increases the more that compliance with a law or regulation is removed from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, as we will be less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
The profit and loss account has been prepared on the basis that all operations are continuing operations.
Templeborough Biomass Power Plant Limited is a private company limited by shares incorporated in England and Wales. The registered office is 4th Floor, The Peak, 5 Wilton Road, London, United Kingdom, SW14 1AN.
The financial statements are prepared in sterling, which is the functional currency of the company. Monetary amounts in these financial statements are rounded to the nearest £.
The directors have considered the adoption of the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements given the continued uncertainty in the economic climate and have formed the opinion there are no material uncertainties with respect to the company's ability to continue as a going concern for the foreseeable future. In forming this view, the directors have considered the company's current and forecasted performance, including the impact of reasonable downside sensitivities and all foreseeable uncertainties. The directors have also received a letter of support from parent company Greencoat Mermaid Limited as the principal support for the going concern assumption, giving confirmation that the parent will support ongoing operations from at least 12 months of the date of the signing of the financial statements. Accordingly they continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements.
The gain or loss arising on the disposal of an asset is determined as the difference between the sale proceeds and the carrying value of the asset, and is credited or charged to profit or loss.
The interest rate applied has been 10.8%
Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised immediately in profit or loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease.
Recognised impairment losses are reversed if, and only if, the reasons for the impairment loss have ceased to apply. Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (or cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised immediately in profit or loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase.
Basic financial assets, which include debtors and cash and bank balances, are initially measured at transaction price including transaction costs and are subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method unless the arrangement constitutes a financing transaction, where the transaction is measured at the present value of the future receipts discounted at a market rate of interest. Financial assets classified as receivable within one year are not amortised.
Other financial assets, including investments in equity instruments which are not subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures, are initially measured at fair value, which is normally the transaction price. Such assets are subsequently carried at fair value and the changes in fair value are recognised in profit or loss, except that investments in equity instruments that are not publicly traded and whose fair values cannot be measured reliably are measured at cost less impairment.
Financial assets are derecognised only when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire or are settled, or when the company transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to another entity, or if some significant risks and rewards of ownership are retained but control of the asset has transferred to another party that is able to sell the asset in its entirety to an unrelated third party.
Financial liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the company after deducting all of its liabilities.
Basic financial liabilities, including creditors, bank loans, loans from fellow group companies and preference shares that are classified as debt, are initially recognised at transaction price unless the arrangement constitutes a financing transaction, where the debt instrument is measured at the present value of the future payments discounted at a market rate of interest. Financial liabilities classified as payable within one year are not amortised.
Debt instruments are subsequently carried at amortised cost, using the effective interest rate method.
Trade creditors are obligations to pay for goods or services that have been acquired in the ordinary course of business from suppliers. Amounts payable are classified as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less. If not, they are presented as non-current liabilities. Trade creditors are recognised initially at transaction price and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Derivatives, including interest rate swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts, are not basic financial instruments. Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently re-measured at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognised in profit or loss in finance costs or finance income as appropriate, unless hedge accounting is applied and the hedge is a cash flow hedge.
Debt instruments that do not meet the conditions in FRS 102 paragraph 11.9 are subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss. Debt instruments may be designated as being measured at fair value through profit or loss to eliminate or reduce an accounting mismatch or if the instruments are measured and their performance evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy.
Financial liabilities are derecognised when the company’s contractual obligations expire or are discharged or cancelled.
Equity instruments issued by the company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of transaction costs. Dividends payable on equity instruments are recognised as liabilities once they are no longer at the discretion of the company.
When some or all of the economic benefits required to settle a provision are expected to be recovered from a third party, a receivable is recognised as an asset if it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received and the amount of the receivable can be measured reliably.
Provision for the future cost of decommissioning and demobilization of plant and is recognised in full in the year in which the legal obligation is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, this cost is capitalised by increasing the carrying value of the related assets.
The amount recognised is the present value of the estimated future expenditure determined in accordance with statutory conditions and requirements. The provision increases as the discount factors applied in calculating the present value of estimated future expenditure unwind. The unwinding of the discount is included within interest payable in the profit and loss account. The capitalised cost is depreciated as part of the overall capital costs of related assets.
In the application of the company’s accounting policies, the directors are required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amount of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised where the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods where the revision affects both current and future periods.
The following judgements (apart from those involving estimates) have had the most significant effect on amounts recognised in the financial statements.
Property, plant and equipment are depreciated over their useful lives taking into account residual values, where appropriate. The actual lives of the assets and the residual values are assessed annually and may vary depending on a number of factors. In re-assessing asset lives, factors such as technological innovation, product life cycles and maintenance programmes are taken into account. Residual value assessment considers issues such as future market conditions, remaining life of the asset and project disposal values.
The estimates and assumptions which have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities are as follows.
The present value of the future costs associated with the closure and restoration of sites is estimated by management through consideration of the known costs of comparable processes. Management have estimated the cost of decommissioning and restoration activities in future periods and discounted the estimate cost to present value using an appropriate discount rate.
The valuation of renewables obligations certificates is a combination of a determined quantity and an expected recycle value. The actual recycle value is not published by Ofgem until October each year. As such, management have used judgement based on their knowledge and experience of the business to determine the expected recycle value at the year end.
All revenue arose within the United Kingdom. All revenue arises from continuing activities and is attributable to the Company's principal activity and single class of business being the generation and sale of electricity and related services.
The average monthly number of persons (including directors) employed by the company during the year was:
The company has no employees other than directors in current and prior years.
The actual charge for the year can be reconciled to the expected charge for the year based on the profit or loss and the standard rate of tax as follows:
Details of the company's subsidiaries at 31 December 2022 are as follows:
Amounts owed to group undertakings are unsecured, repayable in 2039 and interest is accrued at a rate of 10.83% in the year.
The long-term loans are unsecured.
The loan is repayable in 2039 and interest is accrued at a rate of 10.83%. Interest is payable on a quarterly basis and upon repayment of the loan. Accrued interest may be capitalised when agreed in writing between borrower and lender.
The provision recognised relates to decommissioning costs expected to be incurred in future periods in relation to the power plant. No decommissioning costs are currently expected to be incurred within the next year. The directors have formed an expectation of the future costs expected to be incurred in future periods based on the best available evidence.
The following are the major deferred tax liabilities and assets recognised by the company and movements thereon:
The deferred tax set out above is expected to reverse in a period greater than one year and relates to accelerated capital allowances and losses that are expected to mature within future periods.
During the year the Company entered into transactions in the ordinary course of business with other related parties. The Company has taken advantage of the exemption under FRS 102.33.1A which states "Disclosures need not be given of transactions entered into between two or more members of a group, provided that any subsidiary which is a party to the transaction is wholly owned by such a member."
The immediate parent company is Greencoat Mermaid Limited.
The ultimate parent company and controlling party is Greencoat Mermaid Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales. The registered address for the company and from which the financial statements can be obtained is 4th Floor, The Peak, 5 Wilton Road, London, SW1V 1AN. Greencoat Mermaid heads the largest and smallest group of which the company is a member.