THE_FILM_EDUCATION_TRAINI - Accounts
THE_FILM_EDUCATION_TRAINI - Accounts
Statement of Corporate Governance 1 February 2022 to 23 May 2023
The company's governance framework has been developed by reference to the following:
Committee of University Chairs (CUC) - The Higher Education Code of Governance (December 2014 revised June 2018) (with particular reference to its primary elements, core values and guiding principles) (The Higher Education Code of Governance).
Office for Students (OfS) - Regulatory Framework (Public Interest Governance Principles), and the conditions and ongoing governance requirements set out by the OfS on 31 October 2019.
GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK; The governance for the company comprises:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS; The company is managed by its Board of Directors which has the authority to exercise all the powers of the company and is accountable for all of the company’s activities. The Board of Directors delegates certain powers to the Governance Board and the Principals. The Board of Directors is the main decision-making body who is subject to oversight by the Governance Board and whose decisions are implemented by the Principals and the management team of the company. The Board of Directors is regulated by the Articles of Association of the company and the Companies Act 2006.
THE GOVERNANCE BOARD; In addition to the fiduciary duties of the Board of Directors and their responsibility to meet all regulatory requirements, the Governance Board reviews and monitors regulatory compliance, quality assurance, management systems and programme delivery to ensure high standards are achieved in all areas of the company’s work. The Governance Board is constituted of both executive and independent members. The Board of Directors has also delegated certain powers to the Governance Board to enable it carry out this role.
The Governance Board meets at least three times per year.
The Governance Board has the following responsibilities within its remit:
• Oversee all aspects of the company’s work which is of strategic significance, challenge and question the Board of Directors' and the Principals' decision making;
• Approve the strategic vision and annual budgets of the company set by the Board of Directors;
• Ensure that the company operates in accordance with the stated requirements and expectations of external regulatory and scrutiny bodies. This may include, after consultation with the Principals, reporting to the CUC or OfS (as the case may be) breaches by the company of the regulations laid down by the CUC or OfS where such breach has not been remedied to the satisfaction of the Governance Board
• Maintain oversight across the company of planning, finance, audit, facilities management, health and safety, human resource management, equality and diversity and student development and engagement;
• Establish and monitor systems of control and accountability, including financial and operational controls and risk assessment;
• Review the performance of the company’s senior management team;
• Monitor performance against plans, targets, projects and KPIs;
• Monitor and review issues relating to equality, diversity and inclusivity;
• Track and monitor the performance from the use of public funds to ensure they are used for proper purposes and achieve good value for money
• Align its procedures and protocols with the guidance in the Higher Education Code of Governance;
• Monitor and review annually the contributions of all independent members;
• Review its own performance and effectiveness as a deliberative body every year and produce an annual governance report in respect of such performance and effectiveness;
• Share financial statements and key outcomes of each Governance Board meeting and reports commissioned by the Governance Board, with staff, stakeholders and students.
The company's full "Governance" document can be found at www.londonfilmacademy.com/policy-framework
Statement of Internal Control 1 February 2022 to 23 May 2023
The Board of Directors and the Governance Board have responsibility for maintaining a sound system of internal control that supports the achievement of policies, aims and objectives, while safeguarding the funds and assets for which it is responsible. The Boards act in accordance with the responsibilities assigned in our governing documents, and the regulatory framework and terms and conditions of funding published by the OfS.
We have established the following processes in relation to our risk management approach and for reviewing the effectiveness of our system of internal control:
The Governance Board meets at least three times a year to consider our plans and strategic direction
The Governance Board approves our Risk Management Strategy and Risk Register. Corporate risks are identified in terms of our ability to achieve our strategic objectives
risk management forms part of our planning process and covers all risks – governance, management, quality, compliance, reputational and financial
the company maintains a corporate risk register, which includes an evaluation of the likelihood and impact of risks becoming a reality. The Governance Board receives a report reviewing the corporate risk register at each of its meetings, enabling it to make amendments in light of changes in the risk profile in particular areas. An overall report and updated register is considered annually
The Governance Board reviews the effectiveness of the risk management process and internal controls via receipt of reports and minutes from the Risk Sub-Committee throughout the year
The Governance Board and Board of Directors consider other reports on matters of internal control, including matters raised by way of management letter from the company’s external auditors.
This system of internal control is designed to manage, rather than eliminate, the risks identified: it can therefore only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance of effectiveness.
The system of internal control is based on an ongoing process designed to identify the principal risks to the achievement of policies, aims and objectives; to evaluate the nature and extent of those risks; and to manage them efficiently, effectively and economically. This process has operated throughout the financial year ending 31 January 2023 and up to the date of approval of the financial statements, and has operated effectively and accords with guidance from the OfS.
On behalf of the board
We have audited the financial statements of The Film Education Training Trust Limited (the 'company') for the year ended 31 January 2023 which comprise , the balance sheet and notes to the financial statements, including significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
In our opinion the financial statements:
give a true and fair view of the state of the company's affairs as at 31 January 2023 and of its surplus for the year then ended;
have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
meet the requirements of the OfS's accounts direction.
Basis for opinion
Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
Other information
Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of our audit:
the information given in the strategic report and the directors' report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and
the strategic report and the directors' report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or certain disclosures of remuneration specified by law are not made; or we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or the directors were not entitled to prepare the financial statements in accordance with the small companies regime and take advantage of the small companies' exemption in preparing the directors' report.
As explained more fully in the directors' responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.
In identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement in respect of irregularities, including fraud and non-compliance with laws and regulations, we considered the following:
1) Enquiries of management concerning the company's policies and procedures relating to:
- identifying, evaluating and complying with laws and regulations and whether they were aware of any instances of non-compliance
- detecting and responding to the risks of fraud and whether they have knowledge of any actual, suspected or alleged fraud; and
- the internal controls established to mitigate risks related to fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations;
2) The company's remuneration policies, key drivers for remuneration and bonus levels; and
3) Discussions among the engagement team regarding how and when fraud might occur in the financial statements and any potential indicators of fraud.
In common with all audits under ISAs (UK), we are also required to perform specific procedures to respond to the risk of management override
We also obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory framework that the company operates in, focusing on provisions of those laws and regulations that had a direct effect on the determination of material amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The key laws and regulations we considered in this context included the UK Companies Act and ISAs (UK).
In addition, we considered provisions of other laws and regulations that do not have a direct effect on the financial statements but compliance with which may be fundamental to the company's ability to operate or avoid a material penalty.
As a result of performing the above, we did not identify any key audit matters related to the potential risk of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations.
In addition to the above, our procedures to respond to risks identified included the following:
- Reviewing the financial statement disclosures and testing to supporting documentation to assess compliance with provisions of relevant laws and regulations described as having a direct effect on the financial statements;
- Enquiring of management concerning actual and potential litigation and claims;
- Performing analytical procedures to identify any unusual or unexpected relationships that may indicate risks of material misstatement due to fraud;
- Reviewing correspondence with relevant tax authorities.
- In addressing the risk of fraud through management override of controls, testing the appropriateness of journal entries and other adjustments; assessing whether the judgements made in making accounting estimates are indicative of a potential bias; and evaluating the business rationale of any significant transactions that are unusual or outside the normal course of business.
We also communicated relevant identified laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all engagement team members, and remained alert to any indications of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit.
We note that our audit is not primarily designed to detect non-compliance with laws and regulations and the Directors and other management are responsible for such internal control as the Directors and other management of the Company determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to errors or fraud, including compliance with laws and regulations. Additionally, owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that we may not have detected some material misstatements in the financial statements, even though we have properly planned and performed our audit in accordance with auditing standards. We are not responsible for preventing non-compliance and cannot be expected to detect non-compliance with all laws and regulations.
A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at: https://www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor's report.
Other matters which we are required to address
The OfS requires us to report if, in our opinion, grant and fee income as disclosed in the notes to the accounts has been materially misstated.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
The Film Education Training Trust Limited is a private company limited by guarantee incorporated in England and Wales. The registered office is 843 Finchley Road, London, NW11 8NA.
The financial statements are prepared in sterling, which is the functional currency of the company. Monetary amounts in these financial statements are rounded to the nearest £.
Income and expenses are included in the financial statements as they become receivable or due.
Expenses include VAT where applicable as the company cannot reclaim it.
The gain or loss arising on the disposal of an asset is determined as the difference between the sale proceeds and the carrying value of the asset, and is credited or charged to surplus or deficit.
The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.
Restatement of comparative figures.
Comparative figures have been restated to show direct costs in line with the current year's treatment. This restatement has no effect on reserves.
In the application of the company’s accounting policies, the directors are required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amount of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised where the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods where the revision affects both current and future periods.
The average monthly number of persons (including directors) employed by the company during the year was:
Two employees received a full-time equivalent basic salary of £100,001 to £105,000 (2022 none).
Included in other creditors is Deferred Income of £1,756,476 (2022 £1,687,775)
The company is limited by guarantee, not having a share capital and consequently the liability of members is limited, subject to an undertaking by each member to contribute to the net assets or liabilities of the company on winding up such amounts as may be required not exceeding £1.
As the income statement has been omitted from the filing copy of the financial statements, the following information in relation to the audit report on the statutory financial statements is provided in accordance with s444(5B) of the Companies Act 2006:
The auditor's report was unqualified.